(→History: new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
No, this is a portal page for the faction and is intended to be highy detailed, while specialised pages split off from it. Also, the page has not been reworked to meet current wiki standards, and when this is done, much of the redundant information will be removed and placed elsewhere anyway. [[User:Montonius|Montonius]] 00:58, July 1, 2012 (UTC) |
No, this is a portal page for the faction and is intended to be highy detailed, while specialised pages split off from it. Also, the page has not been reworked to meet current wiki standards, and when this is done, much of the redundant information will be removed and placed elsewhere anyway. [[User:Montonius|Montonius]] 00:58, July 1, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | I don't know about splitting off, however, I find the TOC excessive, specifically the long(incomplete? though the article is locked) list of the "Forces of the Eldar" subsections. IMO either the TOC levels should be limited to 2 or the subsection should be converted into bullet points. --[[User:Flugente|Flugente]] ([[User talk:Flugente|talk]]) 09:33, October 21, 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Eldar/ tau relations section overhaul? == |
== Eldar/ tau relations section overhaul? == |
||
Revision as of 09:33, 21 October 2013
Split into multiple pages?
Could we please split this into multiple articles? I think it would allow for more overview information to be placed here while at the same time preserving the detailed factoids we all love so dearly. Fusion 7 19:15, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
No, this is a portal page for the faction and is intended to be highy detailed, while specialised pages split off from it. Also, the page has not been reworked to meet current wiki standards, and when this is done, much of the redundant information will be removed and placed elsewhere anyway. Montonius 00:58, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
I don't know about splitting off, however, I find the TOC excessive, specifically the long(incomplete? though the article is locked) list of the "Forces of the Eldar" subsections. IMO either the TOC levels should be limited to 2 or the subsection should be converted into bullet points. --Flugente (talk) 09:33, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
Eldar/ tau relations section overhaul?
I was reading the Eldar/Tau relations section, and I feel that it is both out-of-date and misses out on a lot of the nuance in their relationship. First of all, the rather upbeat quote about the Tau from Eldrad at the top runs against the more pessimistic tone of the passage itself. More importantly, the statement about there not having been major contact between the Tau and Eldar is out of date: In DoW- Dark Crusade and Soulstorm, they Tau and Eldar are squared against each other, and the dialogue implies that the Tau and at lest some Eldar craftworlds might have some diplomatic contact and that the Tau regard the Eldar as wise, if mysterious and sometimes adversarial.
With that, I was wondering if I could overhaul the section. Fusion 7 (talk) 18:46, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
No thank you, the section is fine as is and may eventually be deleted outright. The outcome of the video games on Eldar-Tau relations is not discussed in canon and would be considered speculation. Montonius (talk) 10:35, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
History
The history section is missing an interlink to a main article dealing with Fall of the Eldar