Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-6078851-20130415204132/@comment-7186329-20130612201231

I had to re-read this entire discussion.

As for the meaning of life, here are the factors to consider. What are the chances of life, even more so through bacteria to exist and evolve in the first place? Even if life comes to a state of self awarness and define itself does if create and follow its own purpose or is it bestowed one? If life never stops evolving, or advancing how far can it reach? Can it reach a state defined by others as godhood? Can life create life? How much can life change and influence its surroundigs, such as their own planet, or even galaxy? Even if life does not have a meaning, it has a purpose. It`s even a good one.

At some point physicists or scientists realise that everything affects everything. As you said the human body is mostly water, and even the human brain is 60% water. So apart from gravity as a factor, how many other influences could there be? Just about everything. The brain for example is an extremely sensitive organ. The whole idea of the full moons influence is not just about more light as to see, but that minor increase in gravity affecting the brain and body on a cellular level, synapses and blood vessels of the brain for example. What else can influence the body? To pinpoint the which part is most subjective to influence. Apart from the obvious factors such as food, water, air, sleep, light,activity, temperature, darkness even position the second greatest would be the water in the human body itself. Water has a memory. Not only that it is influenced in all sorts of ways. The highest impact is sound. Sound is vibration of the air. Different frequencies of sound have different impacts. That same vibration aslo effects water. Shouting underwater anyone? That means that music can and does influence the body. Do you think todays crap music, might have any negative influence to people? Why don`t we just look at todays generation, which has forgotten what classical, instrumental or even good music is. Are they doing OK? Of course music is just one of the factors. The less obvious one to have influence would be solar radiation, dark matter, frequencies of sound, gravity, chemicals in the body and food, minor toxins in the air and a number of other not constant and sudden events or one time ones to consider. So, do you think that this `golden age of thought` has happened before, and is actually a cycle that affected life some time ago, stopped, and is now again becoming a positive factors. Even more so, that the last time it affected people they found out about it, and have even predicted when it will end and begin again? There is an abundance of Undeniable evidence to prove that.

Here is how star observation works. Telescopes look at the light in space, light which takes time to travel. For example the light emmited from the sun takes 8 minutes to travel to Earth. That means if the Sun explodes, we won`t find out for 8 minutes. The light that is being caught and observed by telescopes is actually billions of years old. That means we are looking at past events, that have already happend or are happening billions of years ago. When that collision with Andromeda happens, there is nothing to worry about. The sheer size of the Galaxy means there will not be like a mosh pit, stars and planets will not collide and all that. It is gonna be quite a show. And also, Earth is going to be pulled into the Sun in a few billion years, so there is that.

As for the Universe. Well...it is another example of unreleased information, covered up facts and even disputes within the top scientific communities themselves, which has simply not been made public. Let me say it like this. The biology books can be rewritten, the physics books can be rewritten, the books on morals and such can be rewritten, the books on geology can be rewritten and the "History" books can be burned and written again from scratch. All books need to be rethought. I think even you would be astonished how much supressed, hoarded and false knowledge there is. One thing i have learned. Never trust conventional sources and awlays check them. And if someone gives you, what can be considered extremely controversial information simply check it yourself, and then consider how to react. That is what I am hoping you would do as this discussion progresses. Infact the only reason i have not suggested using Skype or the like is because someday someone might actually read this and learn something. So let this be public.

Let`s continue. The estimated age of the universe is around 14 billion years, or 13.7 to be more "exact". So what if stars have been found whose estimated age is older than that of the universe? What about the "Big Bang"? The idea of it is that at some point everything, the entire universe, was concentrated, or a single point and then exploded, creating everything. The argument behind the big bang and the universe expanding is that because when the light coming from distant objects is observed there is, what is called a "red shift". When waves of light are streched and become longer, that is called a "red shift", when light, compressed and the light waves shortened, then the spectrum of light is shorter and it is seen as a "blue shift". So red light is far and blue light is near. And because the waves of light seem to be "red shifted" then that must mean the objects are Supposedly moving away. So if the universe was supposed to be expanding, then it must have been closer at some point together at the past. That is the idea on the Big Bang. Now what are the problems? If you look in space what is seen are irregular, unevenly distributed concentrations of starts. Or clusters of stars. If the universe was at some point a single point, as Big Bang suggests, then "exploded", which is not an accurate term, then that would mean that matter would be evenly distributed. This is called the cosmological principle. Uniformed distribution of matter. IF the universe originated from a single point, then all matter would be evenly distributed. Instead you see those clusters of stars all over. And then there is the question of matter. If at some point the universe was an infintesimal point of energy, even if it exploded, then there would not be anything. It is a fact that energy can become matter, and matter can become energy, but if the universe was energy and then exploded then what about matter and antimatter? They would have cancelled eachother out and there would not be anything in the first place. Here is the best part. The Big Bang violates the Law of Angular Momentum. Everything is spinning and rotating right? If the Big Bang happened, then it shouldn`t. If there was an explosion, then when it happened everything was shot out in straight lines. There should be no rotation of the galaxies, panetls or whatever in the Universe. The answer to that is, that the infintesimal point, from which the universe began must have been spinning. If that happened, thenthe Law of Angular Momentum would dictate that when the explosion did happen, the matter, or energy would have been spinning in the same direction as that dot was spinning originally. So if it was going clockwise then everything would be spinning in that direction, and if it was going counter clockwise then that direction. That would mean that everything in the universe that spins would be spinning at one direction or another. Do we have that? No. Everywhere you look in the universe stuff is spinning, rotating, orbiting at all sorts of directions. But they are not spinning at the same directions. Planets, moons, Galaxies are spinning backwards. In our own solar system Venus, Uranus, Pluto and even some moons  are spinning backwards. Even counter to the orbit of the planet. So now it is said that a "counter force" stopped  the spin and turned it the other way around. Such a force would tear the planet in pieces, and what about the entire galaxies? Such a theory is simply implausible. Example is the star system Pleiades in the belt Orion. Pleiades is known as a bound cluster. That means the gravity within the system is equal to the force that wants to separate them. And then there are the Globular Clusters such as M13 in Hercules. Look them up if you wish. I will not even go into the formation of atoms, and hydrogen. The human body alone has every element in it, the odds of that even occuring are staggering. Einstein himself had some trouble figuring those out. And the "solutions" and those ARE theoratical, NOT practical or even applicable. The so-called "theory of relativity" is based on the idea of just that- relativity and bullshit. Here is how it goes. . See what i mean about those books?

If i ever start with biology, the extremophiles will be covered. And if you think the idea of the Big Bang is flawed, then biology will be like a new science.

America is a "Democracy" in the media, but on paper it is "fascism". The FEMA camps, or concentration camps. The CIA can uprehend people when they wish, NSA spying and storing info on everybody. The CIA itself is an organization that covers the truth, not expose it. There are so many chemicalls in the food, that it is like poison. There are two basic factors needed for a democracy. The first is a leader elected from the people. All US presidents are cousins. They are from the same family. This is even public information, there were interviews on CNN on the matter. They do not hide it. They even admit to be from the same "super secret" clubs, like the Masons and the Knights of Malta. There is not a single president of the US that has not been a member of those "basement clubs", as I have heard them be called. Again this is public, they talk about it, there are interviews and such. The second is free media. There is no such thing as free media, and the mass media is completely controlled. The one exeption is the Internet. In USA you can be aprehended, without charge, on the grounds of suspicion for an indefinite amount of time. But as long as you get  that one vote all is fine right?

Yes it is. That does not mean it cannot suffer an economic collapse, even more so a delibarete one.

The four countries are

Bulgaria. The only reason it does not prosper, in the literall meaning of the word are the politicians. And people know that. They are rotated and thrown from office like toilet paper. It is also the country with the 3rd fastest internet, top ten, five or three in the world for most beautiful women, and the country itself has more history than most. The territory it is located on has great energy, Bulgaria is the only country in Europe with more than a 180 varieties of herbes. And best of all people know what and who causes the problems- government.

Ecuador. The entire situation in Greece is much more dastardly and less complicated, and could have been resolved almost immediatly, had they taken the example of Ecuador and what Correa Rafael did, and the term "illegal debt" which basically means that if the government has made decisions, or piled debt without the knowledge or approval of the people, then that debt does not have to be paid. Which is exactly what happened. After that happened the standart of life skyrocketed. The people do not trust the government. See where i am going with this?

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/10-ecuador-declares-foreign-debt-illegitimate/

New Zealand. Low population, realtively isolated, high standart of living, geothermal power, low pollution, nature.

Canada? The only reason is that I do not want to live there is because it is next door to the US.

And Japan? Biggest factor? I love sushi. I am not going into the details, because some events will occure there, and unless they can be confirmed or disregarded they should not be stated. The economical collapse of China is almolst certain at this point.