Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-72.93.45.26-20141015021039/@comment-72.93.45.26-20141015180309

If it says Be'lakor is the only undivided prince just ignore it. That's just some bad writing. Lorgar is THE face of Chaos Undivided now.He is probably way more powerful than Be'lakor too. Having taken out An'ggrath before princedom, and spent 10,000 years sucking on chaos' teat....mmmmm sweet chaos milk of enlightenment and carnage...I would put my money on Lorgar. He has a lot more friends too, Magnus the Red, M'kar, Kor Magron (awesome name), an entire, still intact, legion, and a quite elite one at that, and of course billions of slaves and daemons. Be'lakor is cool though so no hate on him. He could win but it would have to be through slimy means. Not head on. Lorgar does seem to not take kindly to avant-garde combat, but still Lorgar with a much better likelihood.

My problem is why do this rule? And it especially doesn't make sense since most chaos followers, including CSM, are undivided. Why not give the players this option? I could see the idea of showing that a prince backed up by all four is very rare, but they should still make it an option and make the mark of chaos undivided be like 200 points. I don't care I want an undivided prince! The balance of chaos is appealing to me fluff wise. And I like things about all four ruinous powers and wouldn't want only one. GW has gone and f***** up again!!!!!!! (manly tears of disappointment run down face)