Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-37.152.33.225-20131111163502/@comment-37.152.33.225-20131228172116

I never said there was no evidence of Primarchs being corrupted, of course there is. I said there is no evidence to suggest any of the loyalists suppossedly in the warp (Russ and Corax, maybe Vulkan) would be corrupted, none whatsoever. What makes you think they could be easily corrupted? You have simply pointed out the circumstances in which the traitors were corrupted, they were all willing to side with chaos in one way or another.

@Question of the Lion

1. Chaotic beasts on planet of discovery does NOT equal corruption by chaos, again absolutely no evidence to suggest that would be the case.

2. yes it was really warp energies used, evryhting I have read, mostly on this wiki, clearly states this, otherwise, Primarchs could be produced without the Emperor

3. Why does 'leaderless' mean they are easily influenced? Answer = it doesn't

4. one of the only things you have posted I would agree on

@High Lords - don't think anyone said they would give up their power for a Primarch, rather wondering how they would react if loyalist did return.

@Custodes - again, what posts have you been reading? I at no point said the custodes had any power in either legislature or jurisdiction. All I said was I would be interested to see their reaction, if any, to the retutn of a Primarch.

You seem to disagree with everything anyone has posted on this thread, but the fact is, there is no reason a Primarch could not be written in for a return, far stranger things have happened. Also, to assume the loyalists would be corrupted simply because they are unaccounted for is just ludicrous.