Board Thread:Warhammer 40k Roleplay/@comment-28917471-20150603055254/@comment-25177957-20150607195613

Does the wording really matter at all? The point is that the article proves that part of the bio to be valid. It also says no where that a particularly proven IST couldn't be a member of an Inquisitor's personal retinue. Thus, I'll be changing my bio to better represent that. I don't think you have any need to continue bickering about the meaning.

Like I've said before, I posted my bio un-revised, is this extreme critisism actually constructive, or is it simply to get me out of the RP. ZiXIS has honestly been more constructive.