Thread:Montonius/@comment-4811793-20120614004957/@comment-3993996-20120615213016

As being an edioter of Star Wars fanon, they have the right thing going. Lets say you find a user who doesnt use correct grammer-you fix the article, and give them advice. This creates a friendly atmoshpere. On Warhammer 40k fanon wiki, one admin went a tad harsh on a user due to his article having NCF elements in it. The user felt slightly intimidated, but the admin than said "Sorry. How about I'll help your fix your article so we can be friendly". I was once bannedfor not abideing with Star Wars fanon image policy. They had warned me a few times, and I pay the price. They only blocked me for 3 days, which made me think, "Hmmm. I won't do it again". I saw why users of Star Wars Fanon got pernement bans, which mainly said:Intimidating behevoir, harassment, vandelisam, spamming, and trolling. These had happend over a period of mounths/days. Now, only 1 permermnet ban I know of of Warhammer 40k fanon wiki happened because of intimidating behervoir, numerous NCF articles, thearts to post viruess onto people computes and poor spelling and grammer. This happened over a period of about six months. Quite frankly that was a resonable excuse to give him a pernerment ban. One slightest twinge of a grammer mistake is a riducluos reason for a 100 year ban. Also banning users because they are IP's bascicly means you are not really doing what wiki is famous for-"The free encyclopedia ANYONE can edit" Quite frankly these banning polices is why I dont contribute anymore.