Board Thread:Warhammer 40k Video Games/@comment-216.80.140.168-20140624020305/@comment-6078851-20140630034549

i know we're kinda veering off-topic but i'm curious as to how any of those things makes a game not a true fps.

the idea of fps is that it's an accurate representation of gun-combat in the 1st person: if you're in actual combat with a gun you look down sights and, if needed, sprint.

i actually agree that the game avp isn't a true fps, it's an amalgam of different styles with the marine's part being an fps, but i fail to see how regenerating health, sights, and sprinting, make something not a true fps. by that definition do you also say that halo, cod, and a whole swathe of others, also are not true 1st person shooters?