Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-37.152.33.225-20131111163502/@comment-74.128.152.190-20131213020852

Neithan02 wrote: imo the problems are somewhat simple: 1.allegiance issues of chapters to their, now again, primarch. aka first primarch then imperium, with the chapters, the chapter masters are more equals than anyhting else. (see conclave of baal, where Dante asked but did not order for the support of the other BA chapters)

'''No issues here. The Primarch would take charge of their Chapter that retained the name of their Legion (IE Guilliman becomes master of the Ultramarines CHAPTER and defacto leader of all its successors, though they would retain their autonomy unless part of a battle group).'''

2. who commands, high lords or primarch?

'''Again, no issues here. The High Lords of Terra existed before all the loyalist Primarchs became non-players for whatever reason. At the time, the Primarchs functioned as Generals just as in the Great Crusade, except Guilliman became "Warmaster".'''

3. who is his opponent? aka you have to bring back a character on the side of chaos and all other armies that is of the same caliber.

Primarchs can fight other Primarchs.

4. how has he changed

'''If you're reffering to the Emporer, probably not much. Primarchs? They'd be pissed, especially the ones in stasis.'''

5. can he deal with commanding only 1000 astartes and fulfill a much smaller role? '''Again, the Primarchs would command their individual chapters but in a conflict on the scale of the 13th Black Crusade they'd be given bigger command responsibilities. Especially if Guilliman is tasked as "Warmaster".'''

@ That posting well let#s see

1. they all left for the crusade instead of governing the worlds after they had conquered them (after their heritage had become clear). Actaully few of them were peaceful leaders (Fulgrim and Guillian)

They left because the Emporer told them to. If you remember, Curze and Perturabo were both reluctant to leave their worlds.

let#s look at the others:

Yagathai: conquered a culturally superior country with his nomadic barbarians (see attila vs roman empire)

Which gives more credit to the fact that their superior intellect and stragic mindsets would allow them to govern their regions of space adequately (Guilliman and Curze are proof of that as their influence extended to more than the planet they landed on as infants).

Angron: actually never led more than a slaver#s revolt (Spartacus)

Irrelevant, because he never had a chance to rule a planet.

Curze: domination through atrocity

'''No, it was peace through reprissal. Those who obeyed the laws went on with their lives (and productivity sky-rocketed). Those who broke the laws ... only did it once ...'''

Corax: nuked his opponents (yeah good leader that is (and yes i know of the slaves and theior dealings)

I'm thinking of a nation on Earth that did the same sometime in the 20th century ...

lorgar: crusades anyone? burn the heretics.

'''Tailored to his people's "spiritual needs" thus being able to understand mortals on a much deeper level then his immortal brethren. Were his decisions right? Open to interpretation'''.

Russ: leaves the tribes of his world alone, letting them fight it out

Because the Emporer commisioned him to lead his Legion in the Great Crusade.

Lion: by the time the emperor arrived, he was controlling the orders (and wiped out the last one) ut did not really do anything related to non order people

'''He was controlling the orders. Obviously he has strong leadership skills, thus...'''

^