Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-27642965-20160211003725/@comment-8881468-20191106225938

1 I stated that to me it was shoddily written, poorly acted garbage, I dunno how you drew your conclusion from that

2. it actually is ^^

3.look at them, sure, we see them having directional thrusters in source material and we alsdo know that hey have from f.e. let the galacy burn and flight of the eisenstein ^^

4.once again I asked you for specific source material and you come up empty.. discussion 101 support statements with evidence... otherwise it is simply worthless waste

5. Wookiepedia article; Blaster first Paragrah sentence 2 emphasis made by me "Operating under the same principles as laser weaponry, blasters converted energy-rich gas to a glowing PARTICLE  BEAM that could melt through targets. canon source: Star Wars: The Force Awakens: Incredible Cross-Sections to dumb it down for you: blasters fire beam, aka straight lines, which means they cannot go around obstacles, they need direct line of sight to engage enemies.... which, oh wonder, I stated all along..

really, you think the death star survives being bombared with planet shatering ammunition from f.e,. battlefleet solar? especially as it needs to close range and get firing angles...

it is quite funny that you fail to support any of your claims with spource material

it gets quite unamusing when in a debate you have to listen to somebody totally removed from any factual basis attempting to bullshit others into believing his delusions