Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-25618639-20141214213749/@comment-8881468-20180121231546

91.58.234.217 wrote: 206.188.158.84 wrote: to be honest with you three overchargedlance strikes are all it takes to change the course of the war on a planet below (as inquisitor horst says in battle fleet gothicarmada) 1 cyclonic torpedo wich is usually prodused in mass can destroy a planet. it took the empire a star destroyer wih a lasercannon with a six minute charge to do the same. cyclonic torpedos are more effective at destroying worlds than a death star is. The Death Star can destroy a fully shielded planet (Alderan) from 2 million km away. Shields that could hold against the attack of a fleet of star destroyers. The cylonic torpedoes would have been stopped by the shields, if not shot down before hand.

weird that star destroyers are not even frigates in 40k ^^ the power output is very different, alas

we could go into basics like torpedo spheres, who only shoot a bunch of proton torps at a small target, and a cyclonic torpedo delivers a much higher payload... ^^

You also want to bring in thousands of jedi, okay...

there are thousands of librarians, and then you got all the sanctioned psykers of the guard and the inquisition. we are talking billions.

SW is simply drowned in blood if it ever tries to mess with 40k