Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-7699236-20150618150629/@comment-213.205.253.155-20151225121347

Well see given that you are purposefully evasive about your experience, true details and such then that's what makes me question you in such a manner or indeed state a plausible (to me) theory. On the balance, I've suggested my background etc and don't 'hide behind' anything. Ironically you are more anonymous than I as a result. So to coin your apparent favourite phase 'alas I find it quite amusing' you find it quite amusing that you can't seem to admit that you could in principle be wrong, that sources are only as good as the next one which can invalidate them and that actually there are nicer ways of communicating to people.

I'm sure it has been said before that it's more likely a matter of authors/company appetite/ policy preventing it as opposed to ability. Nigh on anything can be written in with a varying degree of...plausible effect.

It'll have the same dynamics as when females joined Gaunts Ghosts or the other females such as in the Tau, other Imperial Guard or Eldar fractions.

This would likely enfranchise some female fans which isn't a bad idea and some male - female female - female story archs.

Personally (much like the star wars thread) I'm more interested in full discussion.

I'm just not precious about the Space Marines been all male or the outcome there of. Why should I be? The gender doesn't make any difference to me personally but I honestly don't think it would weaken the GWS universe. Much with the SW/40k debate - just want people not to grandstand others with 'facts' which are actually opinions e.g. It would be in the 40k universe over the SW.

Oh and given that the 30K and 40k universes are linked they are more than suitable for sharing information between as long as it's considered, balanced and has the caveat that it should be tempered by experience, other sources, logic and 'best guess'.