Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-8881468-20131229020408/@comment-37.152.33.225-20131229155833

@Neithan - its very difficult to have a discusion with you as you don't seem to actually read my previous posts, but I'm happy to try and help you understand again so I'll go through it again.

1. I NEVER said that there was proof or evidence that a Primarch could not be corrupted, all I said was there was no reason to believe a loyalist Primarch would be corrupted simply because they are missing - this is true.

2. Again, I NEVER said a Primarch like the Lion had no contact with chaos surviiving on a planet, all I said on this was having contact with chaos DOES NOT = corruption - also true

3. you should read 'The Emperor of Mankind' page on this wiki

4. I stand by my original statement on this as it is a fact, leaderless DOES NOT = corrupted

5. All I said on the High Lords was that it would be interesting to see what would happen between them and a Primarch if one were to return, which it would. Thankfully most other contributers on here agree with me on this.

6. Just because the Custodes reside in the palace DOES NOT mean they would have absolutely no reaction to the return of one of the Emperors sons. To assume they would not care is absurd.

7. If you are talking about the Primarchs who went into the warp, I say again, there is NO reason what so ever to believe they would have been corrupted. They are the immortal sons of the God Emperor, who is himself, anathema to chaos.

8. The discussion/possibilities of a loyalist primarch returning are very interesting, hence the other thread being full.