Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-7699236-20150618150629/@comment-86.171.87.114-20151221001931

Your tone is often confrontational, patronising and rude as much as it is (undoubtedly) informative. This appears to have been since you started. This has left me with the direct opinion that you should be reminded of your place whenever possible. That place is as an equal and not the superior that your tone set across. Given that others seem too polite to challenge it, then why shouldn't I. Especially as others have argued with you, likewise they were discounted. You may notice a lack of similar issues with other contributors.

Your reply here is self-aggrandising for example. I am not asking for all that crap you spiel. I need not read up on anything etc. You are avoiding the question which makes you evasive, another character flaw. Just answer the question stated.

When I proposed the principal that all Marines, been Special Forces and trained in the manner that they are, would be able to effectively prosecute all forms of combat. You balked at it. Caveats were stated that of course some Marines and some chapters would have leaning towards a certain aspects but if pushed, they could apply themselves never the less. This was in the thread regarding the ultramarine absorbing of other chapters recruits rumour based thread (certainly don't need to cover that again). So why now are you saying as I did? Do you argue for the sake of arguing? Is this in an attempt to try and show (note worthy) knowledge by shooting off about various bits of information?



Hubris is shown when you make a statement (Bile been naff, only really amounting to his mutated astates) but then when showed that he actually showed enough skill and knowledge to produce super astates, able to overcome a primarch, you scoff at it. Why not just own up to it. We all make mistakes. That is why, currently, I don't respect you.