User blog comment:WindOfTheUnwrittenLaw/Syntax Question: Removal of the term "Clip" unless it is referencing a "Clip"/@comment-8881468-20140927113635/@comment-25451195-20140927122910

I think we just had a classic misunderstanding of thoughts via the horrible system of expressing thoughts (written words over verbal discussion)

Im fammilar with internal magazines (looking forward to restoring an Arisaka next year) and i deal with Stripper clips semi regularly with my current line of work.

Below is the text from the "Autopistol" Page

An Autopistol is a hand-held, fully automatic Auto Weapon that fires solid-slug ballistic rounds at the intended target in rapid succession. The origin of Autopistols lay in Mankind's past, in its precursors the ancient machine pistol and submachine gun, that date back to at least the late 2nd Millennium.

Feed: 5-30 rounds straight magazine

The Picture depicts a Grimdark Uzi like weapon.

the text of the page that i was initally referencing was

2 Autopistol Clips - These clips contain the metal-jacketed ballistic rounds used by an Autopistol.

so with out mentioning a magazine, are they implying that once the auto pistol in ref. (some cadian what ever mark) is fed using clips, and maintains an internal non moving magazine?

im kinda blown if they are. unless the pistol is a revolver, having rounds exposed to the constant dust and grim that just accumulates from being out doors is acting for a mechanical failiure of some sort. (Activity of warfare demanding functional cleaning of ones weapon regularly to maintain operational use... and one next higher up from chewing you a new one)

im starting to think i might have in my morning over caffination, just went high and to the right when i saw that.... just Social media for example is filled with just utterly wrong statements all the time.... Look up "Ghost Gun, California politican" to see what I see daily when i am in the States.