Board Thread:Warhammer 40k General Discussion/@comment-24081662-20150320002747/@comment-24081662-20150423161644

I thynk that the decide-what-happens-after-an-attack thing sounds reasonable enough, so I suppose I can accept that rule. And of course, OPness is restricted (naturally). The main thing to decide is what 'is' OP and what isnt. I am thynking that the scale of the conflict wyl get progressively larger over the course of the RP and so at the beginning we probably wont be fielding massive armada's and legions upon legions of soldiers, but by the end we wyl have ammased countless resources and artifacts and... Wyl, the point is, while there wyl of course be a limit to the powers of our characters and their effects on eachother, this limit might be fairly high by the end.

As for the whole 'GM' thing, I dont know if I want to... Ok, its not that I dont want to do it that way. Its more along the lines that I fyrst off thynk everybody should have their own personal RP force- including me, the hoster- and that I figure everybody would probably be worried I would be biased in my judgements of what happens if I was both GM and had my own force. If everybody could trust me to be unbiased (which I promise I would try my hardest to be) then that could work pretty well though.

Also, I would just lyke to mention; The events and ending arent set in stone. The idea I had was that everything we do would actually affect how the events turn out and the lyke. And finally, I wanted there to be progression; As the RP progresses we would ammas more resources, more forces, and obtain artifacts or the lyke which would steadily make us more powerful.